Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 361 - 380
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am
” Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has an update on Ryan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
” Kent Scheidegger’s comments for Crime & Consequences can be accessed here. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
" There were 106 death sentences in 2009 compared with a high of 328 in 1994.Kent Scheidegger and Doug Berman, both quoted in today's NY Times story on the report, both manage not to see any real trends in these numbers, which I guess shows again that you can find in statistics whatever you look for. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 3:52 pm
"The proposed regulations of June 2007 were basically sound and only minor tweaks were needed," said Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, Calif., who is a strong proponent of both the fast-track procedures and states' certification. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that Toca v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the summary reversal in Johnson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 2:23 pm
"This is a dramatic reaffirmation of what we've already known for some time, that capital punishment in California takes way too long," Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the law-and-order Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, said of Johnson's bet that he will live a long life on death row. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
Kent Scheidegger of the Crime and Consequences blog has posted a review of the last term’s criminal law rulings, concluding that “it could have been worse. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am
Over at Crime and Consequences Kent Scheidegger and Bill Otis will happily expound on why Spisak should be killed and the legal standards are way too generous to the criminally accused, convicted, and sentenced. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am
Lyle Denniston reported on that denial and the order list more generally for this blog, while Kent Scheidegger has coverage of yesterday’s proceedings at the Court at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:19 am
I covered the stay for this blog, while Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 11:49 am
"Judge Pregerson has been a reliable and reliably wrong vote to overturn death sentences in nearly every capital case he has sat on," said Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the pro-death penalty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation.He called the judge's departure from active status "good news for the victims of crime and the cause of justice. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who discusses the timing for a successor at PrawfsBlawg; from Kent Scheidegger, who criticizes the record of Judge Jane Kelly in capital cases at Crime and Consequences; and in an op-ed for USA Today, where Eric Wang argues that, although we “may not know for sure exactly what Scalia would have thought about the merits of the arguments now being made about who should appoint his successor,” “we do know what he would have… [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 4:05 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger maintains that “[t]he present political scandal is no reason at all to leave the Supreme Court short-handed. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:40 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to a recent story in The New York Times suggesting that the Court is “drifting leftward”; from a law enforcement perspective, he concludes, it is “not a bad term. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
Gross, in which the Court rejected a challenge to Oklahoma’s use of a sedative normally used to treat anxiety as the first drug in its three-drug lethal injection cocktail, comes from Kent Scheidegger in a podcast for the Federalist Society. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 4:02 am
I think the aspect of the case that may help more people, though, is to debunk forever the propagandistic wives' tales upon which all arson "forensics" was based before the mid-'90s.Doug Berman wondered why the usual pro-death penalty writers have been silent regarding these new developments, but Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences said the Willingham news was not the kind of major event that demanded immediate comment. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 7:17 pm
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger had some very interesting policy arguments to make:Along with the constitutional problems, civil commitment is a problem because it takes another step down a road we have already traveled too far -- the medicalization of crime. [read post]
