Search for: "Khan v Khan"
Results 361 - 380
of 830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Manchester Building Society (Appellant) v Grant Thornton UK LLP (Respondent), heard 13-14 October 2020 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others… [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
NORMAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 10:23 pm
Steinmetz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 4:58 pm
The FTC nixes non-competes One of the earliest reported cases challenging a non-compete clause was Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:49 am
A presentation from Commission staff, and a concurrence from Commissioners Khan and Slaughter, highlighted the billions of dollars the Commission believes it is not able to return to consumers because of the AMG decision. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:30 am
But attempting similar arguments in respect of more established legal systems, such as the US, is much more difficult, as can be seen in another recent extradition case, Khan v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 1127 (Admin) (19 May 2010). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:06 am
See Eichorn v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:05 am
See Eichorn v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 3:20 pm
See Eichorn v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:16 am
While the defendants' cross motion was made more than 120 days after the note of issue was filed and, therefore, was untimely (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648), an untimely cross motion for summary judgment may be considered by the court where, as here, a timely motion for summary judgment was made on nearly identical grounds (see Grande v Peteroy, 39 AD3d 590, 592; Lennard v Khan, 69 AD3d 812, 814; Bressingham v Jamaica Hosp. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:04 am
While the defendants' cross motion was made more than 120 days after the note of issue was filed and, therefore, was untimely (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648), an untimely cross motion for summary judgment may be considered by the court where, as here, a timely motion for summary judgment was made on nearly identical grounds (see Grande v Peteroy, 39 AD3d 590, 592; Lennard v Khan, 69 AD3d 812, 814; Bressingham v Jamaica Hosp. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:26 am
(People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 2:00 am
Kublai Khan (1215- 1294) VÍTIMAS: 19.000.000 PAÍS: Mongólia MODUS OPERANDI PRINCIPAL DAS MORTES: Guerra, assassinatos Com nome também traduzido como Khubilai ou Kubla, o “khan” (“chefe”) era neto do conquistador Genghis Khan. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:01 am
But given that it is often the case that the SEC and FTC face similar constitutional issues (recall that Kokesh v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Jane Sutton at Reuters says that Khan is “likely to serve far less” than the 25-40 year sentence. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 1:47 am
Khan were being held at Gitmo, if Pakistan would simply release him, and if all we had on him were a stated intent to proliferate nukes in the future, he would be the one prisoner who falls into this netherworld. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
“He was also counsel in CCR’s legal challenges to the ‘material support’ statute (Holder v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
“He was also counsel in CCR’s legal challenges to the ‘material support’ statute (Holder v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 12:41 pm
Garage owner Mazher Khan . . . also saw it. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:51 pm
Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 46 So. 3d 1105, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (.....); see also Khan v. [read post]
