Search for: "King v. Edwards" Results 361 - 380 of 421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Waltham, MA; Brad Sampson, President) Bagel Kings Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:44 am
Edwards NASSAU COUNTYTrusts and Estates Impossibility Does Not Excuse a Condition If a Discharge Would Operate As a Forfeiture Estate of Stephen Shaffer NASSAU COUNTYCriminal Practice Court Rules Allegations Support Elements Of Forcible Touching, Public Lewdness Charges People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 5:03 am
NO-FAULT - PAYING ACUPUNCTURE AT CHIROPRACTIC RATES - WORKERS COMPENSATION FEE SCHEDULE Midwood Acupuncture, P.C. a/a/o Yensi Alan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:33 am
Over at No-Fault Paradise Dave Gottlieb reports that Kings County Civil Court Judge Genine Edwards recently "reversed" her November 2007 bench trial decision in Adam Marigliano LMT a/s/o Jennifer Rivadeneyra v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:42 am
Instead, as the Amalfitanos point out, section 487 descends from the first Statute of Westminster, which was adopted by the Parliament summoned by King Edward I of England in 1275. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Instead, as the Amalfitanos point out, section 487 descends from the first Statute of Westminster, which was adopted by the Parliament summoned by King Edward I of England in 1275.The relevant provision of that statute specified that "if any Serjeant, Pleader, or other, do any manner of Deceit or Collusion in the King's Court, or consent [unto it,] in deceit of the Court [or] to beguile the Court, or the Party, and thereof be attainted, he shall be imprisoned for… [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:29 pm
  Instead, it descends “from the first Statute of Westminster, which was adopted by the Parliament summoned by King Edward I of England in 1275. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:30 am
Serious videos and videos that make a point - An Anthropological Introduction to YouTube (another fascinating video from Michael Wesch); From Little Things, Big Things Grow (GetUp's song for reconciliation); Music 2.0 (a video from music futurist Gerd Leonhard explaining what music 2.0 is and how the music industry should change to adapt to 'web 2.0' principles); Some EU politicians support file sharing (the Greens EFA party of the European Parliament publicly expressed their support… [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
He died 3 days later of the injuries at the age of 47. * 1599: Nanda Bayin, a Burman king, reportedly laughed to death when informed, by a visiting Italian merchant, that “Venice was a free state without a king. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:49 am
Brown     Western District of Kentucky at Louisville 08a0664n.06  Edward Lucas v. [read post]