Search for: "King v. Texas"
Results 361 - 380
of 850
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
District Court for the Southern District of Texas found Ali guilty after deliberating for twenty-one minutes. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964), and Spinelli v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
”[13] The court held that other considerations, such as those identified in Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
Three other individual petitioners--Alveda King, Janet Morana and Father Frank Pavone--are directors of Priests for Life.The petitioners' reply brief confirms what I wrote last week: Unlike the government, they are not willing to accept the Court's alternative proposal. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
” As the Court has said repeatedly, most recently in 2015’s King v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 2:53 pm
John King and Tammy Drummond, et. al. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
(Three other individual petitioners--Alveda King, Janet Morana and Father Frank Pavone--are directors of Priests for Life.)The government's argument as to insured plans.The government explains in its supplemental brief that the Court's proposal for employers with insured plans basically describes the government's existing accommodation itself, with one exception. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
They have warned this will mean that 250 staff will have to go, and that proposals for a 30,000 square feet events space at Kings Cross will be scrapped. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
King County, 15-584, but petitioners got the consolation prize of Thomas penning a dissent from denial, joined by Alito. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:49 am
” Texas v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme Court’s March 1, 2016 ruling in… [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:29 am
The Facts of the Case In the case of Brazoria County v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
.Eventually, the United States Supreme Court, on free speech grounds, invalidated state and federal laws that prohibited desecrating the flag, in Texas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:00 pm
Martin Luther King Jr. called Rev. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:23 am
Dissenting again in Lee v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled in its 2013 decision in the case of Crane v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
In the Fifth Circuit, Judge Carolyn King dissented from the majority’s finding that Texas had standing to challenge DAPA. [read post]
