Search for: "King v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 6:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) “Yes,” says Judge Maurice Paul in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 1:58 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:51 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Plessy v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:21 am
On Monday, December 13, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:17 pm
It also made it a state crime for immigrants not to carry documents, thus placing on them the burden of proof that they were present legally in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:49 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 10:46 am
Sixth Circuit examines the adequacy of a district court’s explanation for imposing consecutive sentences In United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:54 pm
Hodges (the “Gay Marriage case”), King v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 8:16 am
” United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
United States (1948), which prohibited a near-identical search conducted as a result of the smell of opium. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:27 am
Trial began Monday with opening remarks in the merger case United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
United States] we see no ground for reaching a different conclusion here. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 2:14 pm
v=8HJbGSHtFYQ&feature=related [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
(Orin Kerr) Today’s news that Paul Clement is leaving King & Spaulding over his defense of DOMA reminds me of one of the big stories among Harvard Law students when I was a student there back in the mid-1990s: The boycott of Sidley & Austin for its representation of the state of Colorado in Romer v. [read post]
