Search for: "LITTLE v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2010, 6:59 am
During oral argument on Monday in Wall v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
Caldwell in Mecklenburg County Superior Court. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:02 am
The Judge directed that the case should not proceed in the Business Court but on the "regular docket of the Superior Court of Guilford County. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:22 am
The Superior Court has already been reversed several times in this case, so it will be interesting to see what Pennsylvania appellate courts do on appeal. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:25 pm
Ed. 2d 49 (2000), and the NJ Supreme Court in Moriarty v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 6:09 am
Superior Court, __ Cal.App.4th __, 57 Cal.Rptr.3d 197, 198 (Cal.App. 2007). [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
It's probably safe to surmise that the plaintiff's position probably received little sympathy outside of certain members of the Bar:Mark V. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm
In Bivens v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:39 am
A few lawyers have told me the view this as a Marbury v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an opinion in Floyd v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:49 pm
Superior Court and Brinkley v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:42 am
The Massachusetts courts had little regard for the insurance company's avarice. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
My statements regarding the state of current privacy laws reflect the holding in Pisciotta v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 6:34 am
Patnode v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm
Superior Court decision in 2008, which said that a zip code does not constitute personally identifiable information. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:52 pm
Superior Court decision in 2008, which said that a zip code does not constitute personally identifiable information. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
The most important one was made by the Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ; Superior Court of Justice). [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
The defendant in Geisslercrain appealed her district court conviction of impaired driving to superior court. [read post]
