Search for: "LIVINGSTON v LIVINGSTON"
Results 361 - 380
of 868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Maine v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 8:51 am
It took the Court of Appeals 2.5 years to reach a decision in this case, holding in a 2-1 vote that the State of New York can regulate this speech.The case is Children First Foundation v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:46 am
What fascinates me is how the plaintiff's credibility was ripped apart at trial but he still won the case.The case is Wiercinski v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:28 pm
So it seems to me that Judge Livingston’s dissent expresses the better view here; I hope the Second Circuit agrees to hear the case en banc, or, if there is no en banc rehearing, that the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case (assuming the Walker v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:54 am
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., May 14, 2015, Livingston, D.). [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:27 am
In a claim for possession brought by a public authority, the European Convention on Human Rights, art 8, gives an occupier the right to challenge the proportionality of the eviction even if his right of occupation under domestic law has come to an end: Manchester CC v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45; [2011] 2 A.C. 104; [2011] H.L.R. 7; Hounslow LBC v Powell and other cases [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 A.C. 186; [2011] H.L.R. 23. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:23 am
United States of America, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
Baidoo v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:26 am
Livingston, 208 Misc. 1033, 1043-1045; Metropolis County Club v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:19 am
Cuomo, March 27, 2015, Livingston, D.). [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd [2015] UKSC 15 When the Court of Appeal held that a disability discrimination defence to possession under Equality Act 2010 had to face the same ‘seriously arguable’ summary test as an Article 8 defence, we were surprised, and very unimpressed. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
LIVINGSTON, C.J., concurs wi [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:50 am
But a Shelter article dusted off my legal brain and piqued my interest on an Equalities Act defence to possession proceedings As a result of Akerman-Livingstone (Appellant) v Aster Communities Limited (formerly Flourish Homes Limited) (Respondent) [2015], landlords, both social and private will have to persuade a court that eviction of a disabled tenant will have to be shown to be proportionate and necessary. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:33 am
The decision sheds light on what the Court wants the complaints to look like.The case is Bohnet v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:58 am
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 1081 The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal involving what was the correct approach for the Court to take in possession proceedings to defences based on unlawful disability discrimination, contrary to the Equality Act 2010, ss 15 & 35. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am
Aster Communities Ltd (formerly Flourish Homes Ltd) v Akerman-Livingstone (AP), heard 10 December 2014. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:53 am
The Court has now changed its mind and says the officers are entitled to qualified immunity.The case is Doe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am
Aster Communities Ltd (formerly Flourish Homes Ltd) v Akerman-Livingstone (AP), heard 10 December 2014. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 11:26 am
For example, in Livingston v. [read post]
