Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 6,726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am by Paul M. Hauge
United States, which resulted in a 4-1-4 decision featuring multiple tests for determining whether a particular wetland could be considered as falling within the statutory category of “waters of the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am by Paul M. Hauge
United States, which resulted in a 4-1-4 decision featuring multiple tests for determining whether a particular wetland could be considered as falling within the statutory category of “waters of the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am by Paul M. Hauge
United States, which resulted in a 4-1-4 decision featuring multiple tests for determining whether a particular wetland could be considered as falling within the statutory category of “waters of the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:24 pm by National Indian Law Library
Texas Dep't of Criminal Justice (prisoner, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)  * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured: Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:47 pm by WIMS
But it threatens to subject a vast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in States and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny. [read post]
23 May 2017, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
The truth is that Indian nations have both sovereignty and property rights over their lands and they do not have a mere license or "permission from the whites to occupy" (as the Supreme Court suggested in the 1955 case of Tee-Hit-Ton v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:33 am by Kali Borkoski
United States it will consider whether purposefully flooding land is a Fifth Amendment taking. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:24 pm
The United States needs new refineries, but... [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:46 am by Kevin Russell
The Tribe and the government argue that the carve-out reflects Congress’s decision to preclude any suit, under any statute, seeking to divest the United States of title to Indian trust land. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:19 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Village of Hobart (7th Cir.): Hobart Brief Oneida Brief United States Brief Hobart Reply TK Lower court materials here. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: This case illustrates the nuances of our federalist system of government, pitting Indian tribe against Indian tribe, and State and local governments against the federal government and an Indian tribe. [read post]