Search for: "Lay v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 5,959
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
The New York Times reports, in a story headlined "Connecticut Budget is Upended as State Workers Reject Deal," on the "rejection" by Connecticut's public employee labor unions of a deal crafted by the Democratic governor that would have, he says, avoided the necessity to lay off 7500 public employees (and throw the state into a renewed recession). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:45 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
30 May 2024, 8:48 pm
Flash back to Trump v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 5:07 am
I'm pleased with the District Court's decision in Perry v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 6:25 am
Tribal Court Lay Advocates and law students can join the Indian Law Section as an associate member here: https://www.montanabar.org/page/ILSassociatemembership (not required to attend CLE). [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
The state had previously filed a compliant brief that covered many of the same points, but we ordered replacement briefs in light of Daire v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:13 pm
Manuel v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
In accordance with LaFontaine v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 7:18 am
This ruling supplements the Ohio State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Will EPA and the states be required to address greenhouse gas emissions in federal Title V permits? [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
But more importantly, and less obviously, by associating abortion with eugenic racism, the concurrence lays a foundation for discrediting — and overruling — Roe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:57 am
The defendant in Lai Lee also cited People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am
Corp. v Peckar & Abramson 2023 NY Slip Op 01085 Decided on March 1, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department cleanly lays out the most unique issue that arises in legal malpractice (and not in other) settings: “But for” the negligence, would there have been a better result? [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 4:15 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:54 am
By Mike Dorf Law students and many members of the lay public learn early on the Blackstonian maxim for every right, a remedy, invoked by Chief Justice John Marshall in the opening passages of Marbury v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
”) But see State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
One panel member will be an independent lay member. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 4:54 pm
Saka Venkata Rao (AIR 1953 SC 210) in which it has been held that Article 191 lays down the same set of disqualifications for election as well as for continuing as a member.Now let’s move on to CEC v Jan Chaukidar. [read post]
