Search for: "Lee v. State of Texas"
Results 361 - 380
of 764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2011, 3:52 am
In Pennsylvania last year, the US 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Renchenski v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
MartinCase Number: 12-cv-00033 (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas)Case Filed: January 3, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 16, 2015 4/1/15 6/30/15 2015-35 SEC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:48 am
Lee's Houston Chronicle report. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
Trump v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:32 am
There are important jury cases on the list -- including at least one, Lee v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:30 am
Wade and Kelo v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
., v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:47 pm
Simply stated, executive clemency does not fulfill its historic responsibility in Texas. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:01 pm
Lee. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
And in Michigan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
Justice Sotomayor’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
France, Jamie E., A proposed solar access law for the state of Texas. 89 Tex. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Anderson sat down with Derek Muller to discuss the independent state legislature doctrine in light of the pending Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
The rules have made it possible for the Eastern District of Texas, for example, to become so popular (for an entertaining 11 minutes, see John Oliver's Last Week Tonight on Patents). [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
He wrote in State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
By Lee Vail, J.D., P.E., Ph.D. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
This is the lowest level of support since 1972, the year the Supreme Court voided all existing state death penalty laws in Furman v. [read post]
