Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure"
Results 361 - 380
of 672
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Copeland v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
A 1958, El Paso Court of Appeals case, Afredo Arellano v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
It contained over 1200 flats, together with leisure facilities. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
It contained over 1200 flats, together with leisure facilities. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:08 am
The recent case of Leisure (Norwich) II Limited v Luminar Lava Ignite Limited has confirmed the judgment in the Goldacre case. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:59 am
The Phillips v Rogan court decision was released by the Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba in Flin Flon on November 28, 2011. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:34 pm
Case is Fischer v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:00 pm
& Murphy v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:12 am
” South Dakota v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:00 am
Jane Doe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
In Bjornson v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Enrico Bonadio, City University London, the City Law School, and Mauro Santo, M&R Europe, Intellectual Property Legal Advisors, Milan, have published 'Communication to the Public' in FAPL v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (C-403/08 and C-429/08) at... [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:41 am
Federal Court:Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul’s International Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1162Full Federal Court:Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 51S123 of the Trade Marks Act sets out that a person does not infringe a trade mark if the trade mark has been applied by or with the consent of the registered owner of the trade mark.Infringement takes place when the alleged infringing use is use as a trade mark. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:42 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bizimana, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 (02 April 2012) R & R Plant (Peterborough) Ltd v Bailey [2012] EWCA Civ 410 (02 April 2012) AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 395 (02 April 2012) Du Plessis v Fontgary Leisure Parks Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 409 (02 April 2012) Kazeminy v Siddiqi & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
It was coincidental that the cricket libel case, Cairns v Modi and Lady Justice Arden’s speech on media intrusion and human rights “Striking the Balance” came out on the same day. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:04 am
Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 – read judgment It was coincidental that this cricket libel case and Lady Justice Arden’s speech on media intrusion and human rights “Striking the Balance” came out on the same day. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:10 pm
Grosvenor v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Lees Leisure Industries, Ltd. [read post]
