Search for: "Lincoln v. Power" Results 361 - 380 of 635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm by Guest Blogger
The court found that there were sufficient differences between the original books, which traced from 1912, and the many successive Tarzan movies beginning in 1918 with Elmo Lincoln starring, and that the studio was a grantee of title to the character (Burroughs v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am by Nicholas Mosvick
President Abraham Lincoln had appointed Field to the Court in 1863. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 11:30 am by Joshua A. Geltzer
That may be Trump’s view; but it’s not clear that he has the constitutional authority to act on it, even when invoking his formidable pardon power, once the judiciary has said precisely the opposite. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
The key to the “experiment,” in Holmes’ view, was that we did not give government officials that power. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Charlie Dunlap
For example, President Lincoln reviewed more than 1,600 military justice cases during the Civil War. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 4 February 2016 there will be an application in the case of Power Place Tours v Free Spirit. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript offers a graphic explainer for Class v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:22 pm
Shelter Lincoln Mercury, Ltd., No. 2:07-CV-0097, 2007 WL 3244701, *1 (W.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]