Search for: "Little v. Ives" Results 361 - 380 of 1,634
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Marty Lederman
”    As I’ll explain in Parts IV and V of this post, I think such a categorical “heterosexuals only need apply” policy would violate Title VII, even if it equally affected gay men and lesbians alike. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:18 pm
The focus on sustainability and data driven governance was given too little attention. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:30 am by SHG
(iv) If the statement is spontaneously made by the suspect and not in response to police questioning. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:21 am
The Applicants essentially argued that the 2012 decisions should be cloned in the present case.To recap, the O2 claim was decided in the same way as any other Norwich Pharmacal action, for which the requirements are: (i) a good arguable case that wrongs have been committed against the Applicant; (ii) the Respondent to the application is mixed up in those wrongs; (iii) the Applicant is intending to seek redress for the wrongs; (iv) disclosure of the information sought is necessary for the… [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 3:30 pm by Renee Anderson
It’s an admirable and timely ambition—consider, for example, Chinese scientist He Jiankui’s shocking announcement in late 2018 that, with little or no ethical or legal oversight, he had edited a heritable gene in two embryos and implanted them in the mother. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am by David A. Martin
In Part V of the census opinion, the chief justice found a way to provide a unique check here. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am by Francis Pileggi
A few weeks ago, I prepared highlights of key decisions published over the last 6 months or so (and in some instances a little beyond that period), for presentation to a large law firm based on the west coast. [read post]