Search for: "Little v. Jacobs"
Results 361 - 380
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2010, 9:49 pm
In Gerber v Lectra ([1995] RPC 383 at 411), a case that did not relate to ‘offering for sale’ in a database for medicaments as the German and Dutch decisions do, the High Court (Jacob J) ruled that offering a patented product for sale within the term of the patent for supply after the expiry of the patent, does not constitute an infringing act". [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:33 am
Factory Five Racing, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 4:06 am
” Skipping on a little, Jacob LJ continues:“[70] The only way the Patent offers to find out whether you have got everything right is to test it. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:50 am
Further details of this little event can be found here. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:11 am
The winner: Cat(therine) Slater (Serjeants) suggests that “the successful IP lawyer will be wearing a new perfume/aftershave soon to launch with a marketing campaign devised by Lord Justice Jacob: “L’Oréal … beyond the wildest dreams of the poor” [If this allusion needs explanation, see Jacob LJ's comments in L’Oréal v Bellure, noted here by the IPKat]”. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Technogenia v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
The case is Scheffer v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm
In fact, the entire Omega v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Allen, Ethan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
Young & Co), whose team of intellectual property footballing giants was as follows:Goalkeeper: Chris Woods [not could]Defence: Spencer Prior [art],[Problem and] Sol Campbell,Emanuel E-Bo-AMidfield: Emanuel Petit-[ion for review],Lother [Added] Matthaus,FRAND Lampard,OHIM HargreavesStrikers: Karim BenzITMA,Rudi Voller-[tary Divisional Application],Arjen Robben [Jacob]Manager: Giovanni [Art.123(2)/123(3) Trap]-patoniSubstitutes: Miroslav Klose-[st prior art], Gennaro Gat [v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:21 am
That's what happened in Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Inc. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:23 pm
(Ilya Somin) Today is the fifth anniversary of Kelo v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
A court which was sadly lacking Lord Justice Jacob -- who is probably taking a little time off from his strenuous judicial responsibilities to pen some lectures for his new UCL job and to buy a jacket with leather patches at the elbows -- took not very long to dismiss the appeal. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:08 am
In National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
At para.15 of his judgment Sedley LJ quotes him:"In Vodafone v Orange [1997] FSR 34 Jacob J, invited by consent to find the single meaning of words sued on for malicious falsehood, said:"As a comparative stranger to this branch of the law I find the "one meaning rule" strange, particularly for malicious falsehood. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:35 am
See Jacobs v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
He can do no better than to bring to the attention of his readers the words delivered by Lord Justice Jacob this morning: "3. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 1:29 pm
Since that decision, the US Supreme Court has only made one single ruling against any sex offender laws; the Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:27 pm
Nemec v. [read post]
