Search for: "Locke v. State of Florida*" Results 361 - 380 of 401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
Id. at *3-4.Turning to the motions to dismiss, the court threw out the entire complaint, lock, stock and ad damnum clause. [read post]
1 May 2009, 1:31 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeFree With Registration: Locked-Out Ex-Girlfriend Had Authority to Give Police Consent to Search Ex-Boyfriend's HomeUnited States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
These adverse developments have generated a wave of private securities litigation, as well as regulatory inquiries by federal and state authorities. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:55 pm
Sullivan's case, it seems there is only one other appeals court decision about whether young teenagers may be locked away forever for rape. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
  The ruling, written by Justice Breyer, came in Locke v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:09 am
Michelle "stated she knew of one time that her mother had atleast three or four young boys in her bedroom locked up with herranging from ages 12 to 14 yrs and that she knew that there wassex acts going on and that one of the subjs that was in thebedroom with her mother was Harold, Jr., her stepbrother. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:41 pm
The two amendments would have amended the Florida constitution to authorize school vouchers, to remove its “no aid” to religious institutions provision from the declaration of rights, and to write the dissent in Locke v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:41 pm
The two amendments would have amended the Florida constitution to authorize school vouchers, to remove its “no aid” to religious institutions provision from the declaration of rights, and to write the dissent in Locke v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
  The petition said the rulings incorrectly applied the Court's 2004 decision in Locke v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:06 pm
Hot off the press and only available at TalkLeft: Peniel Cronin's revised Caucus v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 4:09 pm
In the first part of its opinion in United States v. [read post]