Search for: "Lord v. Smith" Results 361 - 380 of 467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
’ Graham Smith, writing on his Cyberleagle blog, provides a detailed run-down of the implications for internet publication. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 3 December 2010 an application in the case of Smith v ADVN (No.9) will be heard by Mr Justice Tugendhat Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJ [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:55 am
As Lord Justice Jacob (giving a judgment with which Smith and Patten LJJ agreed) explains: “Before Neurim could be allowed to sell their patented formulation (for which they use the trade mark Circadin) they of course had to get regulatory approval. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:18 am by Jennifer
King (Annex KF 228 .K36 K56 2006) Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am by INFORRM
The House of Lords debated Lord Clement Jones’s Private Members Bill, which aims to set out a legislative framework for the responsible use of algorithmic and automated decision-making systems in the public sector. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
In Dillon v Cush; Dillon v Boland ([2010] NSWCA 165) the New South Wales Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the defendant on the basis that the judge’s analysis of qualified privilege and malice was flawed. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
You just can't get enough Lord Mansfield. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
" It follows that, as Pumfrey J said in Halliburton Energy Services Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1623 (Pat), [2006] RPC at [60] "over-meticulousness is not to be equated to carefulness. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
Also on 21 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Smith v Backhouse [2023] EWCA Civ 874. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am by INFORRM
There were hearings in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard (3 February) and Lord Ashcroft v Independent (3-4 February). [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am by Frank Cranmer
” Food labelling On 19 December 2022, Henry Smith (Crawley, Con) asked the Secretary of State for Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs, whether she planned to publish proposals for the introduction of mandatory animal welfare labelling for food. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The US Supreme Court rejected such an argument in Arkansas Educational Television Commission v Forbes (1998). [read post]