Search for: "Lowe v. Lowe" Results 361 - 380 of 14,180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2021, 11:09 am by Nedim Malovic
The average consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole and does not engage in an analysis of its various details (OHIM v Shaker (C‑334/05 P)).The Applicant had submitted that there could be no likelihood of confusion because there was no similarity between the goods. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 5:21 am by Legal Talk Network
Supreme Court dismiss a class action suit brought by smokers in Maine, who say they were misled into believing that "low tar" and "light" cigarettes are a healthier alternative to regular cigarettes? [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The proposed Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”) in incoming President Donald J. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:47 am by Daily Record Staff
Stephens Church, LLC (“Lumenary”) applied for a special exception and two variances in 2017 in order to construct an assisted living facility for individuals suffering from memory-related illnesses in a Residential Low-Density Zoning District (“RLD”). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:30 am by koherston
Wife had a high school education and had worked in several relatively low-skilled jobs. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 4:07 pm
Today's New York Times: With No Frills or Tuition, a College Draws Notice, by Tamar Lewin: Berea College, founded 150 years ago to educate freed slaves and "poor white mountaineers," accepts only applicants from low-income families, and it charges no... [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals affirms a large attorneys' fees award in a wage-and-hour claim that did not produce a large damages award for the plaintiff.The case is Caltenco v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:40 pm by Josh Blackman
As low as that number is, it was made even lower by DIGs. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:13 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled 8-1 [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in CompuCredit Corp. v. [read post]