Search for: "MAJORS v. MAJORS"
Results 361 - 380
of 61,576
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:27 pm
On Monday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
Bruen, in which the court struck down New York’s handgun-licensing scheme, the justices will hear argument in another major gun-rights case: United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Clapton v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:06 am
The Supreme Court released its decision in Comcast v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:17 pm
Something odd happened during Monday’s 59-minute oral argument in Ayestas v. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 9:39 pm
In Rhodes v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:21 am
Richardson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 6:19 am
Matter of P v. [read post]
7th Issues Major Decision Involving Internet; Craigslist Not Liable For Discriminatory Advertisments
16 Mar 2008, 9:04 pm
Chicago Committee For Civil Rights v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:45 am
New major amendments have taken place in the Condominium Management Act. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 8:50 pm
In Beckwith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:49 pm
On 5 November 2014, the High Court of Australia handed down its decision confirming (by a three-to-two majority) that it is possible to obtain an extension of time within which to apply for an extension of the term of a patent relating to a pharmaceutical substance, so long as the extension application is filed prior to expiry of the patent: Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2014] HCA 42.This decision is an important milestone in a long-running saga relating to the… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:31 am
Major League Baseball has argued that players should be paid when their names are used for fantasy baseball leagues. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm
As an initial matter, the ALJ rejected Petitioner’s assertion that trademark settlement agreements are not subject to antitrust scrutiny in light of FTC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am
The recent Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench decision in K.M.R. v I.W.R., 2020 ABQB 77 highlights developments in the law further expanding entitlement under the nebulous idea of “other cause” which continue to undermine the formerly robust presumption that children over the age of majority have no right to child support (see, for example, Geran v Geran, 2011 SKCA 55 or Szitas v Szitas, 2012 ONSC 1548). [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
First, Chief Justice Roberts asked Deputy SG Gannon why the government did not rely on the major questions doctrine (MQD). [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Wisconsin was a major defeat for... [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 5:11 pm
During oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
