Search for: "MARKS v. STATE"
Results 361 - 380
of 21,462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 4:04 am
., Thorpe v Cerbco, Inc., CIV. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
On 14 February 2024 there will be a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
Moving to another state clearly does require some kind of action with the court. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:42 pm
” Eisenberg v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
But these arguments miss their mark. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
So, for example, in BMW of North America v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
The doctrine applies “where the issue in the second action is identical to an issue which was raised, necessarily decided and material in the first action, and the party who is being estopped had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the earlier action” (Simmons v Trans Express Inc., 37 NY3d 107, 112 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Molnar v JRL S. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Written by Mark V. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Certainly the momentousness of, say, Bush v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am
Here is the complaint: Carano v. [read post]
