Search for: "MATTER OF DECLARING T E R"
Results 361 - 380
of 948
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2016, 10:40 am
These are some consolation, but don’t change my ultimate conclusions about the merits of this opinion. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
R.1:36-3. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:36 am
Trump is a tad more personal in that he declares it "such a great question. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
Dep't of Human Servs. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:14 am
The matter was hardly free from doubt or controversy — witness the bizarre spectacle, which I blogged about a few months ago, of the Kansas Supreme Court declaring the Kansas SORA unconstitutional on ex post facto grounds in the morning, and then immediately overruling itself in the afternoon. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:15 am
[W]e agree with Janice R. that any change in the meaning of “parent” under our law should come by way of legislative enactment rather than judicial revamping of precedent. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
Should the matter turn on the sex on a person’s birth certificate (which may be amended through legal procedures)? [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
The letter for publication reflected the matters addressed in the open letter that prompted Dr. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Code, section 1621: “Whoever having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true… is… [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm
Doesn’t this problem already exist? [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 6:04 pm
A copy of July 7, 2016 of New York (New York County) Supreme Court Charles E. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
This is out of the reach of most claimants. 440.13(1)(m)(n)(o)(q)(r)(s) & (6). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
This is out of the reach of most claimants. 440.13(1)(m)(n)(o)(q)(r)(s) & (6). [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:20 am
In a strongly-worded statement accompanying the FTC’s dismissal of its challenge on Wednesday, the FTC declared that “[t]his case presents another example of healthcare providers attempting to use state legislation to shield potentially anticompetitive combinations from antitrust enforcement. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 6:30 am
” Calling her plan for the economy “well-articulated,” Bogle contrasted the specifics of Clinton’s proposal with Trump’s declaring, “[w]e may not like it but we know what she plans to do. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 12:23 pm
. * E-Ventures v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:36 am
Rivera, Youngstown Prosecutor’s Office, for Appellee State of Ohio Eric E. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
” Section 15610.57, in turn, defines “neglect” in relevant part as “[t]he negligent failure of any person having the care or custody of an elder or a dependent adult to exercise that degree of care that a reasonable person in a like position would exercise. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm
However, Severn Housing are clearly not willing to take even a slight risk on any single person under 35, no matter what their employment or income history looks like. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
One common feature of several of the competing products may, however, emerge as an unexpected limitation on coverage for policyholders: the exclusion of “wrongful acts” commencing before the policy inception date or retroactive date specified in the policy declarations. [read post]
