Search for: "MATTER OF H G A"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2007, 6:28 pm
(g) Whenever the legal mother surrenders her parental rights pursuant to this Code section, she shall execute an affidavit meeting the requirements of subsection (h) of Code Section 19-8-26. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:14 pm
Second, defendants F, G, H, I, J and K established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the fifth and seventh causes of action on the ground of judicial immunity. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 10:39 am
Two of these Defendants – G&H Diversified Manufacturing and Nextier Completion Solutions Inc. [read post]
11 May 2023, 4:00 am
G.S. 132-1.4A(g), (h). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:16 am
The complaint alleges, upon information and belief, that “in or about July 2014 Michael and Alan met with Yeung-Ha and G&Y and then or thereafter Michael and Alan decided [that] Yeung-Ha and H&Y should do legal work for Bill’s estate” (id. at ¶ 15). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:52 pm
"[emphasis added; h/t: Douglas LeBlanc].) [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
(c) For those reasons, granted claim 1 was anticipated by the public prior use Rigidex®P450xHP60.Inventive step(d) Contrary to the opposition division's view, D6 was a suitable starting point for the assessment of the inventive step.The subject-matter of granted claim 1 differed from example 11 of D6 only in that it exhibited a higher Mz(XCS). [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
(c) For those reasons, granted claim 1 was anticipated by the public prior use Rigidex®P450xHP60.Inventive step(d) Contrary to the opposition division's view, D6 was a suitable starting point for the assessment of the inventive step.The subject-matter of granted claim 1 differed from example 11 of D6 only in that it exhibited a higher Mz(XCS). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
See G 2/92 [2], J 3/09 [3.5.2] and T 2495/11 [2.1-2]. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:09 pm
The Defence of Responsible Communication on Matters of Public Importance [28] In Grant, at para. 126, we hold that the defence of responsible communication on matters of public interest applies where: A) The publication is on a matter of public interest, and B) The publisher was diligent in trying to verify the allegation, having regard to: a) the seriousness of the allegation; b) the public importance of the matter; c) the urgency of the matter; d) the… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:47 pm
The above steps (a)-(e) are repeated until an invention crystallizes which convincingly differs from the prior art in some precisely defined aspects, then continue; or no such invention is found, then Exit;g. the results of the computer comparison of the invention with prior art in (d) above are reviewed to check whether the differences from prior art fall solely within the excluded subject matter;h. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:18 am
Michael G., 270 AD2d 123 [2000], with Matter The Vega decision is a very useful case. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 5:49 pm
Both parties waived a hearing on the matter. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:42 am
Reg. 10(B)(1)(h). [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
On May 23, 2007, the Court issued an order directing the Debtor to contact the Chapter 7 Trustee to reschedule the 341 Meeting, to appear at an adjourned hearing on the Motions to Dismiss and to contact the UST to respond to the matters in the UST Motion to Dismiss (the "May 23 Order"). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
G 1/93 [headnote 2] indicates a last possible way out:“A feature which has not been disclosed in the application as filed but which has been added to the application during examination and which, without providing a technical contribution to the subject-matter of the claimed invention, merely limits the protection conferred by the patent as granted by excluding protection for part of the subject-matter of the claimed invention as covered by the application as filed,… [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:19 am
(h) The Plaintiff’s Special Damages These are matters that should be identified by the plaintiff for the defendant, but not as particulars of the pleadings. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:03 am
The Guidelines 2018 and 2019, section H-V, 3.1, provides: If the amendment by replacing or removing a feature from a claim fails to pass the following test by at least one criterion, it necessarily contravenes the requirements of Art. 123(2): (i)-(iii)However, even if the above criteria are met, the division must still ensure that the amendment by replacing or removing a feature from a claim satisfies the requirements of Art. 123(2) as they also have been set out in G… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:34 pm
G. [read post]
