Search for: "MATTER OF K D K" Results 361 - 380 of 2,803
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
If a matter was not commenced on the Estates List, yet falls into one of the categories mentioned above, the matter can be transferred to the Estates List on consent, or on a motion, to either a judge who is hearing the matter (but not sitting on the Estates List), or a judge sitting to hear matters on the Estates List. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:48 am by WSLL
Salisbury.Representing Appellee: Peter K. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 9:29 am
The purchase contract was made in the name of M & K Realty, LLC, which was an entity to be co-owned by Kepple and his friend McGuiness (gee, how'd they think of THAT name?). [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The fact that in claim 2 now only one herbicide (B) is required only corresponds to the abandonment of part of the claimed subject-matter and does not generate a new subgroup that has not been originally disclosed (see T 615/95 [6]). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:24 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The petition is based on the grounds of A 112a(2)(c) and (d) in combination with R 104(b). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 12:47 pm
For them and their identities, it is simply a matter of justice -- that is to say, full equality of treatment and opportunity.But what does the larger picture tell us? [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
In this context the approval of the product by the state-owned energy supplier KEPCO was always an underlying matter of concern. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”[3.4] In the present case […] the ED summoned to OPs indicating that claims 1 and 15 lacked clarity and that the subject-matter of these claims lacked novelty in view of D3. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The Board then added the comment cited above, namely that the stay of the grant proceedings meant that neither the EPO nor the parties could validly perform any legal acts and that the grant proceedings remain unaltered in legal state existing at the point in time of stay (“Die Aussetzung des Erteilungsverfahrens hat die Wirkung, daß in dem ausgesetzten Verfahren weder das Europäische Patentamt noch die Parteien wirksam Rechtsakte vornehmen können. [read post]