Search for: "MATTER OF MENTAL HEALTH OF D R S" Results 361 - 380 of 547
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  Specifically, according to Paragraph 3 of the 2009 Practice Direction concerning the Estates List, the following matters are heard:  (a) All matters arising under Rules 74 and 75 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; (b) Applications under Rule 14.05 regarding estates, wills and trusts, including applications for advice under section 60 of the Trustee Act; (c) Applications relating to inter vivos trusts, whether under Rule 14.05, the Variation of Trusts Act,… [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:12 pm by SO Issues
"I’d be marching in line when we were going building to building, and I’d have to endure the person behind me punching me square in the kidney the entire time. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:13 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer available including: Review & Updated Health Plan Mental Health Coverage As DOL Supplements Guidance On Health Plan Mental Health Parity Rules Western Mixers & Officers Ordered To Pay $1.2M+ For Improperly Using Benefit Plan Funds For Company Operations, Other ERISA Violations Plan Administrator Faces Civil & Criminal Prosecution For Allegedly Making Prohibited $3.2 Million Real Estate Investment Employee Plan… [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:17 pm
According to the District Attorney's Office, it is believed that Kailas, Herlina and Sich were each involved in scheming insurance companies as well as employment health plans by submitting hundreds of fraudulent claims of mental health treatment that they never received or that was inflated in price. [read post]
20 May 2012, 4:15 pm
Ralph did not meet two of the conditions: submission to random drug testing and completion of domestic violence and mental health assessments. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
 42 U.S.C. 1320(d) concerns violating access to a patient's records. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
For example, in R (Nassery) v Brent LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 539 the Court of Appeal upheld the Council’s assessment that, despite the claimant’s sporadic past episodes of mental disorder, he was not “in need of care and attention” at the time of its assessment. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
For example, in R (Nassery) v Brent LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 539 the Court of Appeal upheld the Council's assessment that, despite the claimant's sporadic past episodes of mental disorder, he was not "in need of care and attention" at the time of its assessment. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
For example, in R (Nassery) v Brent LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 539 the Court of Appeal upheld the Council's assessment that, despite the claimant's sporadic past episodes of mental disorder, he was not "in need of care and attention" at the time of its assessment. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am by NL
On (d) - the declaration of incompatibility: 44. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am by NL
On (d) - the declaration of incompatibility: 44. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:52 am by tracey
In re S (A Child) (Abduction: Custody Appeal): [2012] UKSC 10;  [2012] WLR (D)  78 “A child should not be returned to his country of habitual residence if the court considered that his mother who had to accompany him would on return suffer such anxieties that their effect on her mental health would create an intolerable situation for the child. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:29 pm by Rick
They will be sentenced more severely than if they’d taken a plea. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 8:52 am by Gideon
As anyone who’s ever been laid up sick at home for days on end – or someone who’s ever gotten stuck in an elevator or between locked doors in a jail – can attest, the sense of isolation and abandonment seriously distorts our mental health. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:46 pm by Lovechilde
People who had come to fight the power found themselves staying on to figure out available mental-health resources, while others who had wanted to experience a democratic society on a grand scale found themselves trying to solve sanitation problems. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:36 pm by Dale Carpenter
 (2) Judicial-discipline rationale: The amendment is constitutional because, no matter whether health-insurance mandates are rationally related to the interests in cutting costs and providing coverage (indeed, even if they aren’t), it is rationally related to the people’s interest in showing judges who’s the boss. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:17 pm by Rick
You simply offered to accept the dime — later a quarter — found a phone booth, and dialed the number you’d memorized for those who might actually care. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:32 am by Paul Jacobson
It went into effect on 9 March 2001 and the Act's stated purpose is as follows: To give effect to the constitutional right of access to any information held by the State and any information that is held by another person and that is required for the exercise or protection of any rights; and to provide for matters connected therewith. [read post]