Search for: "MATTER OF S C B C and J C" Results 361 - 380 of 2,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  There’s probably a relatively low level of crowdsourcing that’s necessary; eBay is probably a really good reputational system b/c it’s costless to share. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
This essay was originally published in Administrative & Regulatory Law News, the quarterly magazine of the American Bar Association’s Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Section. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:23 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
June 25, 2010, Munley, J.) in which he granted the carrier's F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's bad faith claim in a first party medical benefits case.In Hickey, he Plaintiff was injured in a car accident and began to recieve first party medical benefits under his own policy with Allstate for the payment of his medical treatment. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
says the IP Kitten - the matter was capable of resolution without a reference to the CJEU...] [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
Co., No. 03 C 3923, 2004 WL 2812090 at *1 (N.D. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Representing Appellee: David B. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:01 am
Representing Appellee: David B. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
” Canada’s allocation measures “introduce a new or additional condition, limit, or eligibility requirement on the utilization of a TRQ” that goes “beyond those set out in [Canada’s] Schedule to Annex 2- B. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:30 am by Nedim Malovic
In an interesting decision concerning German football manager Jürgen Klinsmann, the EUIPO Fourth Board of Appeal reversed the Opposition Division’s earlier findings and considered that there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks depicted below. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 11:00 am by Dave
In R(Alansi) v Newham LBC, Stuart-Smith J held that, although Ms Alansi had a legitimate expectation that she would remain a priority homeseeker on Newham’s housing register, Newham had not acted unreasonably and in abuse of its power by withdrawing its representation. [read post]