Search for: "MATTER OF T A AND T R A"
Results 361 - 380
of 53,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2009, 8:25 pm
I didn't think they got that . . . racy over at First Things. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:38 am
DOES THAT MATTER? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 pm
In the present case, the ED's decision is totally silent on these issues, so that the rejection under A 56 is not reasoned, contrary to the requirements of R 111(2). [4]For the further prosecution of the application attention should be paid to G 1/03 [2.5] which stipulates that "if a claim comprises non-working embodiments, this may have different consequences, depending on the circumstances. [...] [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:32 am
A Log Cabin Republican spokesman stated that as a practical matter, lifting the stay has great import since the law is still being enforced. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:15 am
T 0258/21, IPKat). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:26 am
DOTY, JAMES T. and ELIZABETH GRUBA, DEO G. and JEANNE R. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
The OD referred to the date set under R 71a EPC 1973 and to the fact that the letter dated 16 January 2008 was not in their file. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 7:14 am
It doesn’t matter if it’s a car crash or medical malpractice. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The [opponent] has pointed out, based on these documents, that the claimed subject-matter lacked novelty. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 4:29 am
The phaonmneal pweor of the human mnid aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a word are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
A correction pursuant to R 88 1973 should not have been made. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 11:44 am
Don't Give Up On the KidsSupreme Court should reject life without parole for juveniles, says one who knows the systemby R. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
T 1134/06 [4.2]). [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:04 pm
Your golf game and pub crawls are another matter, however. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 11:01 am
This can be derived from the, in the Board’s opinion, exhaustive list of fundamental procedural violations and defects in A 112a(2) and R 104 and R 105. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The decision contains an interesting paragraph dealing with the emotional style of the petition, and possible consequences as to its admissibility.[4] It appears to the EBA that the petition was filed within two months of notification of the decision in question, that the petitioner was adversely affected thereby, that the prescribed fee has been paid in time, and that the petition complies with R 107(1)(b).[5] As regards R 106, the EBA notes that the petitioner argued, as regards… [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The applicant filed a first auxiliary request against which the ED raised objections under R 43(2), A 123(2) and A 54(2). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
If the debate on a particular topic had been closed without announcement of a decision on the matter, the board has discretion over whether or not it re-opens the debate and over the extent to which it does so (see Reasons, point 3.1).3. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:11 am
That appeal was never remitted to the Board, so could not possibly lead to any refund under R. 103(2). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:25 pm
Given Portland's high local taxes and City Hall's spending on one frivolity after another, it's really a disgrace that Chevy Vega and the crew can't get enough ambulances on the street.I suspect all the drug overdoses happening every day aren't helping matters any, either. [read post]
