Search for: "MGN"
Results 361 - 380
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
But cases which run their full course, and in which plaintiffs refuse to be silenced, are extremely revealing of nefarious but clearly quite routine national newspaper practices: for example, the largely unreported phone-hacking case Gulati and others v MGN Ltd (2015), and Max Mosley’s action against the News of the World in 2008, which saw the paper desperately dreaming up ever more threadbare and ludicrous ‘public interest’ defences to put before a distinctly unimpressed… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:32 pm
” The milestone case of Campbell and the misuse of private information Perhaps the most significant case in this field is Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457, the groundwork for which had been set in the Douglas case. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
On 12 November 2019 there was be a CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:37 am
This text/image distinction runs strongly through both the court’s Art 8 jurisprudence (Von Hannover (No 1) [2004] EMLR 21 and(No 2), Rothe v Austria [2012] ECHR 6490/07) and English misuse of private information case law (Theakston v MGN [2002] EWHC 137, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm
The obiter view was expressed that, by contrast with the view of Mr Justice Bean in Cooke v MGN, the time at which the threshold must be surmounted was at the time when serious harm is determined rather than when the claim was issued. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
Furthermore, they were clearly expounded seven years ago in two decisions of the House of Lords which was, of course, at that time the highest court in this jurisdiction: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 and Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
heard 12-16 and 19-20 October 2015 (Warby J) Gulati v MGN, heard 20 and 21 October 2015 (Arden, Rafferty and Kitchin LJJ) Weller v Associated Newspapers, heard 27 and 28 October 2015 (The Master of the Rolls, Tomlinson and Bean LJJ) ZAM v TFW, heard 5 November 2015 (Sir Michael Tugendhat). [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Free Speech versus Religious Feelings, the Sequel: Defamation of the Prophet Muhammad in E.S. v Austria, European Constitutional Law Review, Forthcoming, Stijn Smet, Hasselt University Viewpoint Discrimination, Hate Speech Law and the Double-Sided Nature of Freedom of Speech, Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2017, 687-696, U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 815, Adrienne Stone, University of Melbourne – Law School Internet, Copyright and… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm
Causes of action for invasion of privacy exist in English and NZ law: Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457) and Hosking v Runting ([2005] 1 NZLR 1). [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard 9-13, 18, 24-25 March 2015 (Mann J). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am
The second is entitled “MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom: Naomi Campbell v. the Tabloid Press” which deals with the relationship between privacy and celebrity. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am
As Lord Hope said of Miss Campbell (paragraph 120 of Campbell v MGN Ltd), “… it is not enough to deprive Miss Campbell of her right to privacy that she is a celebrity and that her private life is newsworthy. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 11:40 am
This point was clearly recognised in Campbell v MGN Ltd: as Lord Hoffmann said, it is about ‘the right to control dissemination of information about one’s private life and the right to the esteem and respect of other people’. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
Four - Ashcroft v Foley, Cairns v Modi/KC v MGN, Cammish v Hughes and Rothschild v Associated. 9. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am
This test assesses “whether a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities, if placed in the same situation as the subject of the disclosure, rather than the recipient, would find the disclosure offensive” (in Campbell v MGN Ltd ([2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
On 24 June 2015, Mann J handed down a judgment on costs in the Mirror phone hacking litigation, Gulati v MGN ([2015] EWHC 1805 (Ch)). [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
Next week in the courts The Mirror Group phone hacking trial, Various Claimants v MGN, begins before Mann J on 2 March 2015. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 24 October 2017 Mann J handed down judgment in the case of Various Claimants v MGN Ltd. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm
The obiter view was expressed that, by contrast with the view of Mr Justice Bean in Cooke v MGN, the time at which the threshold must be surmounted was at the time when serious harm is determined rather than when the claim was issued. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
This could be a recipe for confusion” (Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [22], Lord Nicholls). [read post]
