Search for: "Maintenance Dept."
Results 361 - 380
of 420
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 11:58 pm
ISO) that interact for developing standards of safety and sustainability as well as approaches for the maintenance of the highest level of safety in nanotechnology? [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:23 am
Kohl’s Dept. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:23 pm
Valle, SB [Loan, No Interest, No Date Due] 200.81 9/24/2011 Rachel Arzu Unemployed [Car Magnet] 18 Total contributions this election $423.81 Gigi Hanna 8/1/2011 Tony Barber, SB [Non-Monetary: Office Space] 100 8/9/2011 Kevin Savetz, Portland, OR Owner, Savetz Publishing 100 8/9/2011 David Hanna, SB Retired [Loan, no interest due 12/1/2011] 2,900 8/11/2011 Naomi Myerchin, SB Teacher, SBCUSD 50 8/12/2011 Dawn Genzlinger, Seminole, FL IT Manager, Dept of… [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:39 pm
b) Internet (Examples) i. 411locate.com - Locate individuals; ii. wnjpin.net - NJ Dept. of Labor Employment and Wage data; iii. artbrokerage.com - Art values; iv. njrealestate.com - Cost of Living in certain areas; v. quickquote.com - Insurance quotes. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
Ohio Dept. of Veterans Servs, 2019-Ohio-3308. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:05 am
In Tishman v Bogatin,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1392995 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which directed defendant to pay 40% of the cost of the parties' older child's college education. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
id=26260 o Santa Clara County - http://sccinspections.org/onlineinsp/ o Santa Cruz - http://sccounty01.co.santa-cruz.ca.us/eh/consumer_protection/FoodFacilityViolations.pdf o Shasta County - http://www.co.shasta.ca.us/EHI/frmPubInspViol.aspx o Siskiyou County - http://www.co.siskiyou.ca.us/phs/envhealth/foodinsp/foodinsp.aspx o Solano County - http://www.co.solano.ca.us/depts/rm/food_facility/default.asp o Sonoma County - http://food.sonoma-county.org/foodsearch.htm o Stanislaus County -… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:35 am
Morse v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
Case Studies From the Dept of the Treasury, EEOC and the State of Delaware While the Toolkit doesn’t explain why the three case studies provided were selected, other than that they “highlight the successful implementation of a BYOD pilot or program at a government agency,” each provides a useful brief synopsis of “the specific challenges, approaches, and lessons learned. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:25 am
Ohio Dept. of Veterans Servs, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-3308. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:00 am
Dept. of Transportation, S248141. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
("CenturyTel") violated federal and state law by using deceptive billing practices to bill customers for WireWatch, a wire maintenance program. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
Its operators and maintenance employees are members of Appellee Amalgamated Transit Union (“Union”). [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:38 am
Employment Development Dept. (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 923, 935-936 [59 Cal.Rptr.3d 37].) [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
By Hon. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
