Search for: "Majors v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 44,634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:37 pm
Medication abortion, which makes up the majority of abortions obtained in the United States, emerged as a national political flashpoint after the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 12:39 pm
by Dennis Crouch On May 22, 2024, the day after the Federal Circuit’s en banc LKQ v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 11:03 am
CPU Litigation, Bledsoe et al v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
But the grant of a stay suggests that a majority of the court believes the issue is certworthy and that the state is likely to succeed. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:38 am
This decision was precedential and represents a major shift in design patent law. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:17 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:00 am
Justice Kavanagh wrote for the majority stating that “In civil forfeiture cases, the Due Process Clause requires a timely forfeiture hearing, but does not require a separate preliminary hearing. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
A. v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:07 pm
S. 438, 448 (2010); United States v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:03 pm
Justice Alito delivered the 6-3 majority opinion in the case Alexander v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
In his opinion for the majority, Alito rejected the lower court’s conclusion that the state’s Republican-controlled legislature had improperly relied too heavily on race in drawing the challenged district. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:01 am
State v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:39 am
In Ryan, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:28 am
From Tuesday's decision in Robertson v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am
Adding to these challenges is the adoption by the Supreme Court of the “Major Questions Doctrine” in the 2022 case West Virginia v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am
Rams and Chargers games, and other major events. [read post]
22 May 2024, 12:42 pm
On May 16, Justice Thomas issued the majority opinion in which the Supreme Court held, by a 7-2 vote, that the CFPB’s funding mechanism comported with the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution which states, in relevant part, in Article I, Section 9, Clause 7: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law…” Specifically, Justice Thomas held: “Under the Appropriations Clause, an appropriation… [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
., LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 8:30 am
Marquez (Major Crimes Act; Venue Clause) Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. [read post]
