Search for: "Majors v. United States of America" Results 361 - 380 of 2,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that Monday’s decision in Epic Systems v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:05 am by WIMS
It's snowy and cold today in the Eastern United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 3:43 am
Over the past 30 years, an overwhelming majority of people executed in the United States - more than 80 percent - were convicted of killing a white victim, according to Amnesty International.Blacks, however, are about half of all murder victims. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Some of these activities spill over into the United States, and just in 2020, three men were arrested in Texas transporting illicit cigarettes. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm by WIMS
On consideration, in brief summary, the Appeals Court Order indicates, "The petition of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, joined by the State of Alaska, Peabody Energy Company, Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al., State Petitioners and Intervenors for Petitioners, for rehearing en banc; and the petition of the National Association of Manufacturers, et al. for rehearing en banc in No. 10-1073, et al. and No.… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:30 am by Ashley Binetti
Escobar, and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
”   “California courts may exercise jurisdiction over nonresidents ‘on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:48 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
Anthony Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, argued for the United States as amicus in support of U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
  Mitchell’s lead argument, to which he devoted far more pages in his briefs than any other, was that although Donald Trump served as “the President of the United States of America,” Art. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:06 am by Steve Hall
Even for Justice Antonin Scalia, the crassest of the current United States Supreme Court justices, it was a particularly callous piece of writing. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Rather, the justices viewed the case as an opportunity to provide needed clarification of existing doctrine.The Smith majority (not Scalia by himself) described the lynchpin in the system that has made the United States a haven for believers but also a safe place where believers do not have a right to harm others, as it was first stated in Reynolds:Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary because of his religious belief? [read post]