Search for: "Maker v. Maker" Results 361 - 380 of 7,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 10:13 am
The MDL judge overseeing these cases let Darvon off the mat, finding that all claims against it against generic drug makers of the generic equivalent of Darvon are either preempted under PLIVA v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:38 pm
I can only hope that the new Florida False Claims Act and this Supreme Court decision in State of Florida v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:38 pm
I can only hope that the new Florida False Claims Act and this Supreme Court decision in State of Florida v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 5:20 pm by Kevin
 Another intellectual-property dispute between two makers of iPhone flatulence-simulation apps does not seem at all unlikely (as of last year, there were maybe 75 such apps), and if one does, this will provide somebody with a template.Link: Infomedia, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
  The (relatively) recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 8:19 pm by Chris Neumeyer
A few weeks ago, Taiwan’s second largest LCD panel-maker, AU Optronics (AUO), accused two of its former executives of selling AUO’s valuable manufacturing secrets to China’s second largest panel-maker, China Star Optoelectronics. [read post]
The appellate court also affirmed the lower court’s grant of attorney fees to the defendant Running Buddy, agreeing with the lower court both that this case qualified as an exceptional case under the Lanham Act and that Running Buddy was entitled only to one-fourth of its fee request (Pocket Plus, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
Worlds.com sued NCSoft (maker of City of Heroes, City of Villains, Tabula Rasa) on December 24, 2008, in the Eastern District of Texas over alleged infringement of U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:42 am by admin
In Coach Services v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- In ANDA litigation between branded drug maker Alcon Research and generic drugmaker Barr Laboratories, the Federal Circuit affirmed a District Court finding of non-infringement and reversed a finding of invalidity for failure to satisfy either the enablement or written description requirements of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The back-and-forth, (almost) cat-and-mouse-like competition between branded innovator and generic drug makers sanctioned under the Hatch-Waxman Act has been on-going for over thirty years. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm by David Walk
A drug maker still should be able to establish a preemption defense consistent with Wyeth v. [read post]