Search for: "Mark Smith v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
In Smith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
If the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:24 pm
Smith, and in other constitutional contexts as well. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
After Mark breaking post, here's our own Neil's insightful piece on that happy-ending story.* The final curtain in the GOLDBEAR sagaThe word "end" in the Haribo v Lindt golden chocolate bear litigation (see IPKat posts here, hereand here) has just been put by German Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm
Smith v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
Stock, supra (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:17 pm
Code § 39A “Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft” in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:24 am
Julie Adamson, a band member, wrote the music and the vocalist, Mark Smith wrote the lyrics to the song. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 5:02 pm
Folks at McKool Smith have provided some funding and so the winner receives a nice $1,000 check. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 11:16 am
In Gray v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
Mark Walsh explains at the ABA Journal that June Medical Services v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Yesterday’s oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:53 am
In Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
