Search for: "Marks v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC."
Results 361 - 380
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2016, 8:49 am
”); Redwood Empire Production Credit Assoc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 8:49 am
”); Redwood Empire Production Credit Assoc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Texas. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Texas. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[25] The Mississippi Supreme Court said that the domicile of the twins was off of the reservation and that the state court properly had jurisdiction over the adoption proceedings of those twins.[26] In support of its position, the Supreme Court of Mississippi stated that the lower court judge “did conform and strictly adhere to the minimum federal standards governing adoption of Indian children with respect to parental consent, notice,… [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
Last year the Supreme Court ruled on an issue regarding NFL team trade marks and competition law issues in the American Needle case (AmeriKat reports here). [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 9:49 am
That’s straight from Brooke Group v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:49 pm
Rallos, 2008 Westlaw 2550728 (Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, 3rd Division, June 25, 2008), and Hwang v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
The Supreme Court has explained mail fraud this way in Pereira v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
Committee Comments Effective December 1, 1997 In Cantu v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 8:55 pm
See Anytime Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:42 am
A terrible joke for a serious issue that has plagued the US farming community and US courts for years – most recently in an appeal from the Southern District of Indiana to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") in the case of Monsanto v Bowman. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
” The conference will feature several events including a live recording of The Lawfare Podcast with Benjamin Wittes, Senator Mark Warner (D. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:55 am
ROBIE: Your Honor, I'd like to show the witness Exhibit 13, the document we'll mark as for identification.THE COURT: You may do so. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, and Judge Amit Mehta has scheduled closing arguments for May 2024, so it ain’t over until it’s over. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
In such a Ranked-Choice system, because D got the lowest number of first-place votes, he drops out, and his 7 votes are reassigned to the person ranked second on these 7 marked ballots — in our hypothetical, candidate C.Now C is the top vote-getter, with 36 votes, compared to only 34 for A and 30 for Candidate B. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
[People v. firms? [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
The jurisdiction of her several courts, general and local, of law, of equity, of admiralty, etc., is not less a source of frequent and intricate discussions, sufficiently denoting the indeterminate limits by which they are respectively circumscribed. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:23 am
I have seen a District Judge referring to the judgment of the High Court on a point without any seriousness. [read post]
