Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 361 - 380
of 14,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In this piece I will discuss how if at all this provision has been altered by the case of Proctor and Gamble v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ; Known simply as "Baby Dry"; and subsequent cases. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Lee v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am
Almost a decade ago, in Toyota v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:56 am
Braille Battery, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
A Counter-Example: Miranda v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
With the House and Senate passing versions of the America Invents Act that will reform the patent laws as we know them, I thought it would be interesting to look back at how patent false marking litigation burst onto the scene in 2010 and how it appears to be flaming out now in 2011. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 3:54 am
Mark Greaves, a barrister at Matrix Chambers, comments on the decision in Tillman (Respondent) v Egon Zehnder Ltd (Appellant) [2019] UKSC 32 which was handed down on 3 July 2019. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:19 am
The article discusses how the decision could affect the numerous false patent marking cases pending in district courts throughout the country. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:19 am
The article discusses how the decision could affect the numerous false patent marking cases pending in district courts throughout the country. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:07 am
Instead, what is needed is that the link to the earlier mark must be a 'boost' to the later mark [IPKat comment: this has got to be right - how many sales depend purely on the trade mark that they bear?] [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm
See Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
Kat friend Just Wang of Bird & Bird ATMD in Singapore discusses how one can rely on passing off to successfully oppose the registration of a mark. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 11:12 am
The Hearing Officer relied extensively on the judgment in Love & Co Pte Ltd v The Carat Club Pte Ltd [2009] 1 SLR(R) 561. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
The high court’s decision in Barron v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:42 pm
v=XjjC2YNpb18Shri M.P.Vijaya Kumar has right in his statement that one can have any amount of knowledge, but, the same may not materialize in getting marks unless one is good at the art of writing the examination. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am
How is that possible? [read post]
