Search for: "Marty Lederman"
Results 361 - 380
of 806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2014, 8:47 am
Tom Goldstein and Marty Lederman debated the impact of the Wheaton College ruling on contraception coverage for Wheaton College students and employees (and, by extension, other religious non-profits' employees) over at SCOTUSblog. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Lyle covered the Thursday order for this blog, with further analysis from both Marty Lederman and Tom Goldstein (here and here). [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm
Marty Lederman has a very thorough post arguing that the Court is mistaken about this, and Tom Goldstein has a response. 3: This may not be as relevant to the case going forward, but what standard of review did the Court apply? [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
(For a contrary view, see Marty Lederman’s post here.) [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:09 am
(Marty Lederman and I debate the effect of the order here and here.) [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 3:11 pm
At The New Republic, I have a short take on Wheaton, less detailed than Marty Lederman's, below (it was written before I saw his), but offering the contrast with Hobby Lobby in much briefer compass. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm
U.S. ruling was a letdown, notably absent was a liberal concurrence defending broad treaty power against critique of Thomas, Scalia et al [Noah Feldman, Bloomberg View, Peter Spiro/Opinio Juris, Julian Ku and John Yoo, David Golove And Marty Lederman] Think before you ratify: in controlled experiment, framing proposed change in domestic law as “required by human rights treaty” boosted support especially among Republicans [Spiro/OJ; more on international human rights… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:26 pm
[Update: see Marty Lederman's post speculating about the next case.] [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen weighs in with “the good, the bad, and the ugly” in the decision, while Marty Lederman – writing for this blog – examines a “fundamental constitutional principle not discussed” in the decision. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
Other commentary on SBA List comes from Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, who contends that the decision is the “right result here: as I’ve written, getting a probable cause determination against someone at the Ohio Elections Commission is a real injury which has serious political consequences”; from Noah Feldman, who in his column for Bloomberg View suggests that the Court’s unanimity in the case reflects “the gradual erosion of laws regulating speech during… [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 9:53 pm
Marty Lederman offers some thoughts at SCOTUSBlog on the future of standing after SBA List. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:15 am
[Thanks to Marty Lederman via Rellgionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:57 am
At Balkinization, Marty Lederman anticipates the Court’s eventual decision in the challenges to the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate: in one post, he considers how a recent decision by the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:25 am
Steven Mazie summarizes the case for The Economist, while at Just Security, David Golove and Marty Lederman weigh in on the case. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:36 pm
Today, Caitlin Hayden of the National Security Council issued a statement outlining a new legal rationale for the administration’s position (HT: Marty Lederman]. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:04 am
It is now claiming, as Marty Lederman notes, that it complied with the statute because it determined “that the notification requirement should be construed not to apply to this unique set of circumstances. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm
I certainly don’t think, as Marty Lederman put it on Saturday, that it is “truly wonderful news. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:03 am
Marty Lederman tries mightily to interpret Bergdahl’s release as consistent* not inconsistent with the wishes of Congress, but I don’t think he succeeds. [read post]
23 May 2014, 1:57 pm
There’s nothing in law that requires CIA to be silent about itsdrone strike activity either, as Marty Lederman has explained in detail here. [read post]
11 May 2014, 1:01 pm
” Friday afternoon, as Marty Lederman noted, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence distributed a memorandum that sought to clarify that the new policy was being interpreted more broadly than was intended. [read post]
