Search for: "Matter of Applications for Authority"
Results 361 - 380
of 27,870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2017, 5:30 am
As to the first preliminary issue, Vos LJ held that there was no authority in English law whereby a claimant has been deprived of damages otherwise payable on the basis that it failed to seek an interlocutory injunction (i.e. a remedy analogous to an application under the Regulations for continuing suspension of contract-making). [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:20 pm
It will address whether Congress stripped appellate courts of authority to review not just factual decisions but the application of facts to law. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm
Ibrahim, R (On the Application Of) v Westminster City Council (2021) EWHC 2616 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Westminster’s refusal to accept a third homelessness application from Ms Ibrahim, following a review decision upholding a decision that she was intentionally homeless, and a rejection of a second application. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:21 pm
The applicant must report adverse findings from the past ten years and include an exhibit explaining the matter in detail and why it should not be an impediment to a grant of the license renewal application. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:39 pm
This post was authored by Edward Dunphy of Touro Law Center Jacob D. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:49 am
"Yes.It all matters. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 11:02 am
The document, drafted in preparation of the upcoming meeting of the Special Commission on the Practical Operation of the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention and the 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention, concludes that dialogue and collaboration “should be facilitated between authorities responsible for international co-operation in child protection matters – at both the domestic and international levels – with those responsible for immigration and asylum… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
Rule 75.1 provides that, except in a contested Passing of Accounts, the Applicant shall make a motion, in the same way as under R. 75.06 (Application or Motion for Directions), seeking directions for the conduct of the mediation. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:48 am
The Board pointed out, however, that the applicant here is not in privity with the Conservancy, and it would not be proper for the Board to consider an unrelated petition matter involving an unrelated third party. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:25 am
Recent decisions continue to illustrate how an agency’s discretion under substantive law constrains CEQA’s applicability as a threshold matter, and how it can also affect the scope of required environmental review when CEQA does apply. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 3:15 am
P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s copyright for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
How much does this really matter? [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 9:13 pm
This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
To quote the Board itself, “Just as we expect a respondent to comply with an Immigration Judge’s scheduling order or to make an asylum claim on an asylum application (Form I-589), it is only reasonable to expect the government to utilize its official forms in the way the regulations authorizing the use of those forms prescribe. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:00 am
The below article of mine appeared in the Pennsylvania Law Weekly online on July 9, 2020 and in print on July 14, 2020 and is reprinted here with permission.Split of Authority Dominates Issue of Proper Claims of RecklessnessBy Daniel E. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
Constitution, but California law also has a say in the matter. [read post]
31 May 2014, 2:18 pm
However, this distinction in the procedural posture of the instant matter warrants a different result. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:29 pm
Thus, the Planning Board had no authority to approve Good Water’s application for a special use permit. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:53 am
Todd had "ever been the subject of an investigation by any licensing authority," and he checked the "No" box. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 10:27 pm
However, in 2005, the BIA decided in Matter of Perez-Vargas that an immigration judge had no authority to decide whether a new job was the same as or similar to the old job, which determines validity of their visa petition. [read post]
