Search for: "Matter of C.J." Results 361 - 380 of 527
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 4:37 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Further action is this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:37 pm
The Company Court, at that stage, is not expected to hold a full trial of the matter. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am by admin
Whattler (1904), 7 O.L.R. 198, Meredith, C.J., reviewed the legislation in the Province giving jurisdiction to the Court to order a sale instead of partition. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:39 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Accordingly, the state's "Petition for Writ of Mandate or Other Appropriate Relief" is denied. votes: George, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Moreno and Corrigan, JJ. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:40 am by Steve Hall
It did not matter, McDonnell said in a recent interview, that the accused is a woman. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:48 pm by The Legal Blog
'Will' as defined under Section 2(h) of the Indian Succession Act means 'the legal declaration of the testator with respect to his property which he desires to be carried into effect after his death'. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:24 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0117, 2010 MT 179, IN THE MATTER OF: C.J., A Youth in Need of Care. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:29 pm by Steve Kalar
” Id. at *1 (Kozinski, C.J., dissenting).Issue(s): Petition for rehearing en banc.Held: “[T]he matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm by Nathan
Over the weekend, the NYT printed an article calling the Supreme Court under C.J. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
McLachlin C.J. and her colleagues accepted that Canadian defamation law has not given adequate protection to free expression on “matters of public importance” (as protected by s.2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms) (at [57]). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm by Christopher Simon
Andrews, C.J., issued dissenting opinion. **552 *508 York, McRae & York, Michael D. [read post]