Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm
From a legal perspective, where the arrow lands - not where you intended it to fall - is what matters. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 4:25 am
School Dist. v Clark, Clark, Millis & Gilson, 294 AD2d 93, 99 [2002], affd 100 NY2d 202 [2003]). [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
” An accompanying schedule of “Assumed Actions” lists 27 litigation matters, including a complaint filed by Dr. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 6:20 am
Roberts, The Case for Restitution and Unjust Enrichment Remedies in Patent Law, 14 Lewis & Clark L. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
Instead, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) approved and applied Collins. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
Feeney J’s conclusions are also mistaken as a matter of EU law. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Question: As a matter of originalist jurisprudence, do you think Alexander Bickel’s memorandum for Justice Felix Frankfurter in Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
New Zealand On 12 December 2019 Clark J handed down judgment in the defamation and privacy case of Driver v Radio New Zealand Limited [2019] NZHC 3275. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Clark, 2019 ONCA 311 (38687) Police sue AG in negligence and misfeasance in public office. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:28 am
Jeremy Clarke-Williams, partner, and Nilly Tabatabai, trainee solicitor, Penningtons Manches Cooper This article was first published in New Law Journal on 6/12/19 and is reproduced with kind permission [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:44 am
State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 2:06 pm
Front and center will likely be the landmark 2012 case of Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:57 am
HHJ Clarke did not agree that loading the bags vertically without an openable closure, as opposed to horizontally through the openable closure, meant that the result was achieved in a substantially different way – the different methods of loading were held to be “no more than a matter of convenience and preference…and a substantially similar way of working the invention”. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:48 am
The judge found that the documentary and witness evidence suggested that it was possible that Ms Graham had access to the Evangeline duvet in her previous role as a buyer for Shop Direct.This did not matter, though. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 1:42 pm
”Clark County, Et Al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 8:12 am
LLC. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 1:21 pm
Clark’s Market, Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:07 am
Did motive matter? [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:22 pm
As the Supreme Court famously stated in Armstrong v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
The case had been handled by a Grade A solicitor where it was “a relatively low-value, entirely run-of-the-mill matter that would normally be handled by a paralegal or trainee under the supervision of a junior solicitor”. [read post]
