Search for: "Matter of Coleman"
Results 361 - 380
of 885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
News: Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications, Final Submissions in Federal Treasurer’s defamation trial
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am
” McClintock submitted that defamation was a matter of impression, and the “overwhelming impression” was that his client is corrupt. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:04 am
I’m looking forward to hearing Ron Coleman’s perspective on Section 2(a), as counsel for The Slants, a case currently on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and Jesse Witten, as counsel for Amanda Blackhorse and other Native American petitioners who prevailed against the Washington R*dskins last June. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:57 pm
From early on in Monday’s oral argument in Coleman-Bey v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:47 pm
The court began its opinion by explaining how the prosecution arose:On March 23, 2011, Metro Nashville Police Officer Coleman Womack was on routine [Meadows]. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
(And this is why, once again, class, it matters when people who should know better refer to “trademarking” when they mean registering a trademark.) [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:38 am
Also in the cooler was a picture of the late Gary Coleman. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:30 am
Only to find that there is no Diet Coke, or any Coca-Cola products for that matter, only Pepsi products. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
"Under Coleman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 5:06 pm
The matter went to trial where the landlord disputed notice, but lost on that point. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:15 am
” The company’s quarterly SEC disclosures filed for periods ending March 31 and June 30, 2008, disclosed pending matters but did not identify any parties. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 9:31 am
Finally, Coleman got the hint. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:41 am
Nevertheless, because courts presume that every word of a statute has been included or excluded for a reason, as a matter of judicial restraint, courts will not insert requirements that are not provided by law. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 11:28 am
Munson, both Wallechinsky and Wallace and Coleman are all wrong, wrong, wrong. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
FROM THE AUDIENCE: Nothing else matters. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 5:12 pm
Indians, even if it also still means your football team — Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) June 18, 2014 REDSKINS #trademark decision by #TTAB: Inferential evidence is all we have in ex parte matters, but even inter partes it has its place — Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) June 18, 2014 REDSKINS #trademark decision by #TTAB: Where the term is always understood as a racial slur, nature of use at time of regis. not relevant — Ron Coleman (@RonColeman)… [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
A software manufacturer, whose program allegedly truncated the monograph’s original 8-paragraph text to 5 paragraphs, was also sued, and the court allowed that claim to proceed – despite two layers of intermediaries closer to any purported failure to warn (pharmacist and publisher) both having no duty to the plaintiff as a matter of law. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 1:08 am
Jane Coleman and Griff Price’s Secondary Trademark Liability have also been available for free … as is, of course, LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:04 pm
The matter is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
My former law partner and long-time spouse Jane Coleman does. [read post]
