Search for: "Matter of Cruz v Cruz"
Results 361 - 380
of 392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
George, No. 08-12226, 2009 WL 707858 (11th Cir., Mar. 19, 2009), and further reemphasized that, in re-sentencing a defendant under § 3582(c)(2), a district court must leave intact all guideline application decisions made during the initial sentencing, does not have authority to revisit factual matters such as drug quantity, and cannot apply Booker, id. at *2 (citing U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:01 am
When he became a trial judge in Santa Cruz County was in family law court for four years. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
” The Court ultimately found that the evidence in the case “does not demonstrate that Cruz is an Indian”, and remanded the matter back to the lower court with directions to acquit Mr. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:15 am
But, yep, it still matters. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:50 am
Cruz, No. 07-30384 (2-10-09). [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 9:35 pm
City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 (9th Cir. 1988). [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
However, the matter is remanded for clarification of findings at sentencing with regards to whether defendants possessed the firearms in connection with possession of cocaine. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:41 am
" (De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates Homeowners Assn. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 7:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors,… [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
Loving v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:07 am
Loving v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 7:11 pm
Young America's Foundation v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
Because of the release of the Court’s opinion in Baze v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:08 am
The justices' view of such societal trends will matter in Kennedy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 8:32 am
Cruz-Chase v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:35 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment
No Evidence That Sexual Proposition Was Severe, Created Hostile Work Environment
Cruz v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
De La Cruz, No. 06-1659, 07-2515 A conviction for drug-related offenses and denial of a motion for new trial are affirmed over meritless claims of error regarding: 1) a violation of defendant's speedy trial rights; 2) erroneous admission of evidence; 3) denial of the motion for new based on newly discovered evidence; 4) jury instruction; 5) ineffective assistance of counsel; and 6) whether the verdicts were against the weight of the evidence. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 10:11 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Baze v. [read post]
