Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 361 - 380 of 3,532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2022, 7:26 pm by Russell Knight
In fact, there are really only two sets of facts that matter, financially, in an Illinois divorce: the parties’ respective incomes and what assets will be marital property. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:28 am by privacylawyer
Paragraph (c) covers a broader range of observation or recording, but where it is done for a sexual purpose. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: loves that idea b/c it would force evaluation of commonality between the parties, which is worth looking for. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
… CNN argues that the Court did not analyze whether CNN's statement was materially false and that "[s]tatements are not materially false even if they admit of '[m]inor inaccuracies[,] … so long as the substance, the gist, the sting, of the libelous charge be justified.'" … [C]ontrary to CNN's arguments, the Court did not rely on the wrong standard in analyzing the Flynns' false light claim. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: could distinguish university research b/c it’s not products and services. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s a good example b/c it’s a completely made-up language; she thinks that GvO indicates that users’ investment in constructing programs within the language matters. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Social uses are similarly aspirational but less meaningless b/c they have discursive meaning. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 7:28 am by Russell Knight
The jurisdiction of such courts to hear and determine divorce matters is conferred only by statute. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This year, I'm returning to the subject, trying to analyze the strongest arguments for and against such statutes. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
To wit: despite that public religion discourse surrounding abortion, the Dobbs Court analysis took religionas so marginal to its analysis that the term, on its own, never actually appears in its opinions.[14]Rather, the question I’m concerned with here is whether or how we might think about doctrines (especially with the questions placed on stare decisis) that might better recognize a diversity of opinions even if one reigns supreme, while ensuring the rule of law. [read post]