Search for: "Matter of Roberts v Board of Educ." Results 361 - 380 of 485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s second grant, in Lozman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:55 pm by Lovechilde
Board of Education decision, and later served with great distinction as a federal judge. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
 Thus, Judge Sam Sparks felt the need to educate counsel in this matter when they could not agree on the scope of a third party subpoena: The utterly predictable result is shown below: It is a shame that so many lawyers believe that practicing law means unlearning everything we were taught in kindergarten. ***   Oracle v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses a recent drop in the Supreme Court’s public approval rating. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Board enforced the regulation against a physician who did not possess the required specialty board certification. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:02 am by David Ward
Board of Education and Black America’s Struggle for Equality by Richard Kluger The Man to See by Evan Thomas The End of Anger: A New Generation’s Take on Race and Rage by Ellis Cose Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process by Robert M. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:29 pm by lawmrh
Board of Education and Black America’s Struggle for Equality by Richard Kluger [Picked by Adam Liptak, who covers the US Supreme Court for the New York Times] (2) The Man to See by Evan Thomas [Picked by Abbe David Lowell, who defended Gary Condit and Jack Abramoff, among others] The End of Anger: A New Generation’s Take on Race and Rage by Ellis Cose [Picked by Robert Morgenthau, retired after 34 years as NY County District Attorney] Justice Accused:… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:31 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his position, the Appellate Division, applying the so-called Pell test {[Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222], held that “the penalty of termination of employment was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law,”  [read post]