Search for: "Matter of S.W."
Results 361 - 380
of 1,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2022, 5:57 pm
State, 573 S.W.3d 437 (Tex. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 4:34 am
" Whitby, 208 S.W.2d at 69; Stewart, 627 S.W.2d at 588. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 1:43 pm
Arthur, 87, 969 S.W.2d 598,615 (1998). [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
Just as in the case of proximate causation, the question of superseding intervening cause is a matter peculiarly for the jury because of foreseeability considerations. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:51 am
See Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 227–28 (“[W]hen the facts underlying the merits and subject matter jurisdiction are intertwined, [the plaintiff must] show that there is a disputed material fact regarding the jurisdictional issue. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:14 am
See Dresser Indus., 853 S.W.2d at 508; Derr Constr., 846 S.W.2d at 858. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Davis, 261 S.W.3d 811, 815 (Tex. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:37 am
Group, Inc., 162 S.W.3d 409 (Tex. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:16 am
Co., 352 S.W.3d 519, 529 (Tex. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
(presentment is fact issue for jury when properly contested in pleadings and not established as a matter of law). 5. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 7:33 am
Its seminal case on the matter is Penn Central Transp. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:11 pm
., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:53 pm
Such immunity deprives a trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:38 am
Dishman, 135 Tex. 600, 145 S.W.2d 865, 869 (1940); Collins, 297 S.W.3d at 418. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:37 pm
., S.W. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:32 pm
Mayes, 17 S.W.3d 437, 441 (Tex. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:52 pm
P. 185, 93(10); Andrews, 885 S.W.2d at 268; Cooper, 838 S.W.2d at 746; Huddleston, 748 S.W.2d at103-04; see also Panditi, 180 S.W.3d at 927; Nguyen v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:00 am
Riner, 867 S.W.2d 58, 62 (Tex. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:36 am
Conn, 741 S.W.2d 536 (Tex. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
The person upon whom the trust and confidence is imposed is under a duty to act for and to give advice for the benefit of the other person on matters within the scope of the relationship. [read post]
