Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh"
Results 361 - 380
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2011, 10:49 pm
In Swaran Singh v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
Sukur Ali v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:14 am
Mukesh & Ors. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:23 am
The second question arising is whether the courts are doing enough, or indeed too much, to exclude matters of religious doctrine. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:39 am
We have, in the past, analysed the case of Dolphin Drilling Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:22 am
A leading example is New York’s Matter of 1545 Ocean Avenue, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
" Matter of Singh (Data Palette Information Services, LLC), Short Form Order, Index No. 4797/10 (Sup Ct Queens County Jan. 7, 2011). [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Balwant Singh Chaufal & Others has examined in-depth the Definition, Origin, Evolution and Abuse of Public Interest Litigation. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:02 am
Justice Swatanter KumarThe Supreme Court in a recent decision, in Balwant Singh v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:27 am
Desai v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:47 am
[See Sheoparsan Singh Vs. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:06 am
The Committee will review the PCC’s own previous actions in regard to this matter. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm
Shergill v Purewal & Anor [2010] EWHC 3610 (QB) (15 December 2010) - Read judgment In the commotion surrounding the Christian hotel gay discrimination case, it is easy to forget that there is a long-standing principle that English courts will not decide matters of religious doctrine. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:08 pm
In Jai Singh v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:12 am
Ahuja v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
Persons affected by decisions of tribunals or courts have a right to expect that those exercising judicial functions will follow the reason or ground of the judicial decision in the earlier cases on identical matters".It has been opined that in the absence of a strict rule of precedent, litigants would take every case to the highest court, in spite of a ruling to the contrary, in the hope that the decision may be overruled.15) In Hari Singh v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:11 am
A somewhat similar question was considered by the Constitution Bench in Bachhittar Singh v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
The matter was adjourned until next month. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
Once the Hindu Succession Act was passed giving equal treatment to the sons and daughters in the matter of succession, it was only logical that the fundamental guarantee of equality of a status and equality before law is recognized in the matter of adoption. [read post]
