Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 361 - 380
of 19,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm
Code § 73.005(b) provides that In an action brought against a newspaper or other periodical or broadcaster, the defense [of truth] applies to an accurate reporting of allegations made by a third party regarding a matter of public concern…. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:08 am
Here's Rick's Guest Post: "We all like to save money â€" especially on legal matters. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:01 pm
However, the amendment/correction as now contained in claim 1 was not the only possible correction as a person skilled in the art would have to decide between the correction of “170 L (TTA) –> S (TCA)” to “175 L (TTA) –> S (TCA)” or to “170 F (TTC) –> S (TCA)”, i.e. between a correction of the position of the mutation or the correction of the amino acid at position 170 and of the corresponding codon. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:14 am
The question is "whether consumers will perceive matter in the mark as a flag. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm
Nevertheless, it tended to the view that the simulation method underlying claim 1 of each request did not contribute to the technical character of the invention and that the subject-matter of claim 1 of each request lacked inventive step.V. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:28 am
This case is a textbook example of the EPO's strict approach to added matter. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 11:19 pm
In his post below, Saul asks: "If A deletes much of B's existence in the virtual world, or A manipulates B in that world to such a degree that B's real world health and safety are at issue, why should criminal law be thought out of bounds? [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am
On August 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio was to hear oral argument in the case of In the Matter of: A.J. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 4:32 pm
It’s not completely clear, but it appears that when the original judge dealing with the case refused Mr Green’s applications for permission to report, she must have treated him as not ‘duly accredited’ – we know this because Sir James Munby says that if Mr Green didn’t like her decision about his status he should have appealed it (which he hadn’t). [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 4:46 am
§ 541.202(b). [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:20 pm
According to T 766/91 and T 919/97, evidence of general technical knowledge need be submitted only if the latter’s existence is disputed. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
As the Druckexemplar did in fact include page 6, and this was the legally binding text, the objections raised by the respondent-opponent under A 100(b) and A 123(3), based solely on the missing page 6, the appellant proprietor’s requests for correction under R 140 or amendment, as well as the ensuing discussion during the OPs before the Board concerning A 123(3)) and the Board’s finding above were from a substantive point of view legally unfounded (not having… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:05 am
Forum November 6, 2000); offers to sell the domain name to the complainant’s licensee, Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:12 am
CCP 2.132(b)(6)(D), 2.133(b)(9)12.1 Yes:12.2 No:These are important changes, many of them on the leftover wishlist of items we couldn't get into Texas' original racial profiling bill back in 2001, or when a central repository was created for the reports in 2009. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:44 pm
The Second Circuit wrote something like that when it ruled on April 25 that Artist A’s reaping in Artist B’s garden, where Artist A had not sown, counted, as a matter of law, as “fair use” under the Copyright Act of 1976. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:06 pm
” Similarly, Matt Bodie writes: Why wouldn’t the market’s reaction be a sign of this: (a) the AT&T/T-Mobile merger will give the new entity strong market power, (b) there are strong anticompetitive as well as efficiency gains from being bigger and having more market size, (c) the newly merged company would use that power to crush its weakest competitors, i.e. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:04 am
Rule 4.2 in most states prohibits, without consent of opposing counsel, communications about a matter with a person represented by counsel in that matter. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
”; T 1208/97 [4(b)]: “A 69 does not offer any basis for reading into a claim features which can be found in the description when judging novelty. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:33 am
The opponent invoked the grounds for opposition pursuant to Article 100(a), (b) and (c) EPC, which are all maintained in these appeal proceedings.II. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
In the present case, the appellant’s statement of grounds of appeal did not include any argument regarding the obviousness of the claimed subject-matter. [read post]
