Search for: "May v. Board of Directors"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 11:16 am
In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:45 pm
In Simeone v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 10:29 am
When a board is entrenched in their positions as directors, they may use their role to pursue their own self-interest, rather than trying to maximize profit for the shareholders. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:57 pm
FXCM, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 12:36 pm
In Quadrant, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that the business judgment rule continues to apply to board decisions post-insolvency even if the board is not disinterested and even if the transactions at issue may have a disproportionately beneficial effect to shareholders at the creditors’ expense, as long as the board’s decisions are reasonably intended to maximize the benefit to the corporation as a whole. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:02 am
The plaintiffs also sought to have the two directors removed from the board due to "rigged elections. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:54 pm
Jude Medical v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
Technically, once the carrier obtains the HIPAA, a subpoena may not be necessary, although many medical record offices are instructed to release nothing to a court or work comp board without a subpoena. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 8:00 am
In Galaviz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 5:42 am
Since Corwin v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 5:42 am
Since Corwin v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 8:18 pm
In Ryan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm
The bylaws are a substantial step forward in drawing a picture of how the board, which is due to start hearing cases in the first half of this year, may work in practice. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:57 am
Ethicon argues that the Director’s decision to allow the same Board panel to institute and make the final decision raises due process concerns because the decision maker, upon granting the review, may be no longer be impartial. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 11:18 am
Finally, and as a general matter, it is important for directors to keep in mind that, no matter what, potential claimants may later emerge, who, armed with the benefit of hindsight, may seek to question both the board’s actions and motivations. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:32 am
Ch. 2006), or the directors in McPadden v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
The SCC has confirmed that Peoples holds that the board may take into account the interests of a range of stakeholders whereas the QCA suggested that the board must take into account the interests of a broad range of stakeholders, including, in this case, the debentureholders (paras 39, 40). [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 2:17 pm
For years, homeowners association boards of directors have been mindful of the FHA’s requirements and taken care that board decisions do not discriminate against any of these protected classes. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 2:17 pm
For years, homeowners association boards of directors have been mindful of the FHA’s requirements and taken care that board decisions do not discriminate against any of these protected classes. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:00 am
One of the more intriguing developments that has come out of the insider trading case against Raj Rajaratnam has been the role of Rajat Gupta, the former managing director of McKinsey and, more relevant, a former director of Goldman (he left in May 2010; in 2009, his last full year, the total reported value of his director compensation was $450,8762) and Proctor & Gamble (where, in 2010, the total reported value of his director compensation was… [read post]
