Search for: "May v. Justices" Results 361 - 380 of 52,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2013, 7:42 am by Ronald Mann
The Federal Circuit may be in for another hard day at the Court when the Justices hear argument next week in Medtronic v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The media and the public are hyper-focused on the impact of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement on whether Roe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:45 am by Jason Mazzone
Justice Scalia, who joined Justice Thomas’s majority opinion in Marsh, wrote a separate concurrence in which he disputed Justice Stevens’s view that—as Justice Scalia described it—“[w]hen a criminal defendant loses a questionable constitutional point, we may grant review; when the State loses, we must deny it. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm
On May 31, 2011 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd. [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:14 pm
This opinion by Justice Yegan contains less than 425 words. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
Mr Justice Arnold found that Conversant's patent is essential and infringed by Huawei and ZTE, but invalid for added matter: Conversant v Huawei [2019] EWHC 1687 (Pat).For a background summary of the dispute see IPKat here. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 12:13 pm
Justice Simons comes off extremely well here.Everyone agrees on the result. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:12 am by Federalist Society
In a decision issued by Justice Sotomayor, the Court held by a vote of 9-0 that immunity under the ATSA may not be denied without a determination that the disclosure at issue was materially false. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:12 am by Federalist Society
In a decision issued by Justice Sotomayor, the Court held by a vote of 9-0 that immunity under the ATSA may not be denied without a determination that the disclosure at issue was materially false. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
”  Justice Kennedy seemingly reached the opposite conclusion in Gonzales v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Depending on the facts, though, Justice Thomas' stated concerns over an advisory opinion may be overstated. [read post]