Search for: "Mays v. King County"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,406
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
King County, 904 F.3d 1126, 1129 (9th Cir. 2018), the court reviews King County Metro's denial of a request to post a controversial ad on a King County Metro (hereinafter, "County" or "Metro") bus. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
King County, 904 F.3d 1126, 1129 (9th Cir. 2018), the court reviews King County Metro's denial of a request to post a controversial ad on a King County Metro (hereinafter, "County" or "Metro") bus. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
Following on the heels of Monday’s announcement that Anthem, Inc. is paying a record setting $16 million to resolve charges its violations of the enterprise risk assessment and other requirements of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule allowed cybercriminals to breach the electronic protected health information (ePHI) of more than 79 million patients, physicians and other health care providers, health plans and health insurers, health care… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
Health plans, their employer and other sponsors and fiduciaries, health insurers, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates should study and learn from the just announced, record-setting $16 million resolution agreement between health insurance giant, Anthem, Inc., to resolve Department of Health & Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) charges that Anthem, Inc. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
McGraw Hill Cos., Inc., 120 AD3d 1052 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Novikov v Oceana Holdings Corp., 46 Misc3d 561 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2014] [discussed here]). [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 6:35 am
Sajid v Nuur (2018) CLCC, 30 July (Judgment here) A county court appeal arising out of a set of proceedings starting with a disrepair claim by a private sector tenant, which raises issues of service and when second proceedings are an abuse of process. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:14 am
(See Barbara King Family Trust v Voluto Ventures LLC, 46 AD3d 423, 424 [1st Dept 2007].) [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 9:26 am
King County) that the exclusion of "demean[ing] or disparag[ing]" material was unconstitutionally viewpoint-based, and thus inconsistent with the Supreme Court's recent decision in Matal v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
If the list does not help you, it may help me. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:38 am
” “As plaintiff’s third-party claim was dismissed on the merits in the Kings County litigation, it may not be relitigated here. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 11:21 am
And thus deponent makes this affidavit that a warrant may issue for [the subject's] arrest.... [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:04 am
More than a year later, the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed the May 2014 Order (Gershman v Ahmad, 131 AD3d 1104 [2d Dept 2015]). [read post]
Repeat After Me: You May Not Expel a Member of a New York LLC Unless the Operating Agreement Says So
17 Sep 2018, 3:25 am
For an example of a case in which the court upheld the right to expel a member based on authorizing language in the operating agreement, see Garcia v Garcia, 2011 NY Slip Op 52261(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Dec. 6, 2011] . [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 4:20 am
DHG commenced an action on plaintiffs behalf against the City of New York in Kings County Supreme Court under the Index no. 506293/2013 (the Kings County action). [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Kings County Justice Esther M. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
William John Hanna who held the seat for Lambton County West for the Conservative Party from 1902 to 1918, and was the head of a successful local law firm…introduced young Patrick to the business of legal practice. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:15 am
Corp., 46 Misc 3d 670 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2014] [holding that a $4.9M derivative judgment from skimming of restaurant’s cash receipts “is an asset of the corporation that should be added to the value calculated&r [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am
The underlying action is pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 13874/13. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:35 pm
See Forster v. [read post]
