Search for: "Mays v. Paul"
Results 361 - 380
of 7,370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2023, 1:06 am
Il n’empêche que, dans le cadre du contrôle de la décision attaquée du 8 juin 2020, il y a lieu de tenir compte de ce que la décision antérieure du 7 novembre 2018 était matériellement contestée (cf. arrêt du TAF A-4077/2021 du 11 mai 2022 consid. 1.3). [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 9:34 am
See Frese v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
And it may now be unavoidable. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:40 am
The dissent by Judge Paul Niemeyer digs into the issue. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 4:21 pm
From Sharpe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
For this reason, when an agency proposes a rule that requires paperwork burdens on any entity (including individual income tax returns), as a housekeeping matter, it must include its estimate of paperwork burden hours and costs in the rule proposal, collect public evaluations and comments regarding its initial numbers, and submit the revised estimates to the OMB for approval.[8] Importantly, an agency may not enforce the collection of information unless it checks all the… [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Bhanu, Paul T. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 1:20 am
The ECtHR Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova v Russia on the legal recognition of same-sex couples. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, in the seminal case Goss v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
” By this point, Texas v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
Gossman and Gordon V. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
In Upsolve v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:52 am
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:38 pm
The text of the draft may be accessed HERE. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:24 am
Astley v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
As demonstrated in Felipe Martinez Rubio v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
I devoted a chapter to the critique by Paul Carrington not only of Critical Legal Studies as a way of analyzing law, but of the proposition that “crits” should necessarily be welcome within the American legal academy. [read post]
