Search for: "McGuire v. McGuire" Results 361 - 380 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2008, 9:19 am
Wiretap guru Judge Betty Fletcher (left) brings us a disappointing Title III decision this week in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:24 am by Giorgio Buono
Court Decisions Zeno Crespi Reghizzi, ‘Mutual Trust’ and ‘Arbitration Exception’ in the European Judicial Area: The West Tankers Judgment of the ECJ; Mary-Rose McGuire, Jurisdiction in Cases Related to a Licence Contract Under Art. 5(1) Brussels Regulation: Case-Note on Judgment ECJ Case C-533/07 – Falco Privatstiftung and Thomas Rabitsch v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:10 am by Sheppard Mullin
Consumers paid significantly more for goods, the AGs recall, during the years of the "fair trade laws" (Miller-Tydings Act of 1937 and the McGuire Act of 1952). [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:54 am
Warshawsky of counsel), and Debevoise & Plimpton, New York (Patrice McGuire Sabach of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm by Raj Chohan
Dukes Andrew Trask, class action attorney at McGuire Woods and co-author of the Class Action Playbook recently put together a list of takeaways explaining how class action defense attorneys can use Wal-mart v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
McGuire, Civil Action No. 07-CV-4779-JMR/FLN (D.Minn. 2007) and SEC Litigation Release No. 20387 (Dec. 6, 2007) (option backdating); SEC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Edmead further explained: It has been held that an LLC managing member continues “to owe fiduciary duties” to the LLC members until the LLC is dissolved (McGuire v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
Federal Magistrate McGuire thought that the appropriate amount that the husband should receive was nought, nil, nix, zero or zip, or as the Full Court said:The effect of the order made by the Federal Magistrate was that the Husband only received his superannuation interest of $1,500.00 or 0.17 per cent of the net assets of the parties. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:29 pm by assoulineberlowe
The Appellate Court then certified the case to the Supreme Court after determining its holding conflicted with McGuire v. [read post]