Search for: "Merrick v State"
Results 361 - 380
of 493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Dissenting in Mingo Logan Coal v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:09 pm
Wade, the defeat of the Bork nomination, Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:24 am
Court of Appeals Judge Merrick Garland to fill the ninth seat left vacant when Justice Antonin Scalia died eight months ago. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:25 am
See People v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:00 am
In Vegelahn v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Agri Processor v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In 1987, Marshall was the deciding vote for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:02 am
Back in August 2022, I explored the dilemma facing Merrick Garland. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:04 am
“And with his four women as law clerks, it’s the first time in the history of the United States that there have been more women clerking at the court than men. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:27 pm
I remain persuaded by Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:27 am
Janus v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13] As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Helmerich & Payne points to the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Bell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The Constitution states that members of Congress—along with every state legislative official and every judicial and executive official of both the state and federal governments—“shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
In a previous post, I wrote about the attempt by Merrick Garland's Justice Department in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:02 am
Blow to Applicants in UK Class Actions as Mastercard Wins Right to AppealLexology – July 30, 2019 The UK class action regime must take a break whilst the Supreme Court (UKSC) hears the appeal in Merricks v MasterCard concerning the proper approach to certification of a class action. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am
— Michigan v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
• Lester V. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Could the United States find a way forward one year after the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attack? [read post]
